PR in the Philippines

(SeaPRwire) –   Humanity’s most primal and potent emotion is fear, and for fans, the most enduring and intense dread is the fear of a poorly executed adaptation. Exactly five years ago, H.P. Lovecraft enthusiasts confronted this very apprehension with the release of The Deep Ones.

Lovecraft occupies a peculiar space in contemporary culture, simultaneously revered as a monumental influence and dismissed as an outdated relic. The term “Lovecraftian” is frequently appended to marketing materials for films, books, and games at the slightest provocation, yet truly faithful and well-made adaptations of his original works are exceedingly rare. However, because Lovecraft’s fiction resides in the public domain—an invaluable cinematic resource—anyone is free to attempt an adaptation, even when such an endeavor is ill-advised.

Released in 2021 and promoted as H.P. Lovecraft’s The Deep Ones, this film offers a loose contemporary reimagining of The Shadow over Innsmouth, one of Lovecraft’s most celebrated and frequently referenced narratives. Helmed by Chad Ferrin, known for directing an Easter Bunny slasher and a segment in Troma’s avant-garde anthology Tales from the Crapper, the movie utterly fails as an adaptation but serves as an insightful case study into the persistent difficulties of bringing horror’s most notorious author to the screen.

The plot follows Alex (Gina La Piana) and Petri (Johann Urb) as they seek solace at a secluded California vacation rental following a miscarriage. Their hosts, Ingrid and Russel (Silvia Spross and Robert Miano, who deliver the film’s strongest performances), are overly welcoming and show an unusual interest in Alex’s health. Petri soon finds himself captivated by the local commune, while Alex grows increasingly suspicious that something sinister is unfolding.

This is a story you’ve encountered before, and almost certainly in a superior rendition. The film is messy, crude, and devoid of suspense, forcing its actors to deliver lines such as “They’re into all this Nerconomicon stuff,” a challenge they conspicuously fail to meet. More often than not, it resembles a satirical soap opera take on Ira Levin (the movie explicitly mentions The Stepford Wives, and Ferrin cited Rosemary’s Baby in an interview). Those who endure to the end credits are “rewarded” with a crude joke about masturbation.

While there are fleeting moments of visual artistry and genuine strangeness, the film appears more constrained by its Lovecraftian elements than inspired by them. It quotes famous names and passages, yet remains thematically hollow. Without singling out Ferrin, it’s notable that when questioned about Lovecraft, he emphasizes ambiance and dread as crucial Lovecraftian components (qualities other horror writers famously disregard) and suggests a good Lovecraft story “hits you days later how scary it was” rather than explicitly revealing its horrors. Yet, his film culminates with its protagonist being sexually assaulted by a fish-monster.

What makes Lovecraft such a persistent hurdle for filmmakers? His narratives are seldom inherently cinematic, relying heavily on suggestion and horrors that his narrators struggle to articulate (with the ironic exception of The Deep Ones’ source material, which includes a memorable chase sequence). However, considering that some of horror’s most acclaimed works never fully reveal their monsters, this explanation feels like a weak excuse. Did The Blair Witch Project or Paranormal Activity suffer from their refusal to show the antagonist?

A significant part of the challenge is thematic. Lovecraft’s often-unpronounceable entities form a vast mythos that any struggling writer can tap into, and The Deep Ones references Cthulhu as if it were a shortcut to profound meaning. Yet, films require human characters to drive the narrative, and Lovecraft’s protagonists are almost universally unstable, isolated men who feel disconnected from their own era and haunted by the infinite future.

Such complex internal states are difficult to convey on screen, especially when resources are stretched to make a few pool noodles resemble convincing tentacles. This visual aspect is where most adaptations concentrate their efforts, largely because, as Chris Jordan of The Movie Sleuth contends, Herbert West: Re-Animator unintentionally set a damaging precedent in 1985. Director Stuart Gordon’s massive cult hit transformed one of Lovecraft’s weaker stories into a grotesque gorefest. While effective in its own right, assuming it represents Lovecraft’s true vision is akin to believing a Bugs Bunny cartoon accurately portrays a night at the opera.

Consequently, adaptations tend to fall into two categories: the “tits and tentacles” variety, where films like The Deep Ones perpetually chase Re-Animator’s exploitative success, and the rarer, more ambitious attempts, such as the still somewhat eccentric Color Out of Space, the moderately successful episodes of Cabinet of Curiosities, and dedicated independent projects like 2005’s silent Call of Cthulhu. These latter examples are few and far between, perhaps best overshadowed by the one adaptation we will likely never see: Guillermo del Toro’s Mountains of Madness.

Some tangentially related fiction does successfully embody its “Lovecraftian” marketing: the world-weary protagonists of Annihilation and True Detective Season 1 capture the essence more effectively than another doomed couple checking into an Airbnb, even if these works only draw loose inspiration while The Deep Ones recites direct quotes. This brings us back to our initial question: why are we inundated with “Lovecraftian” stories, but so few genuine Lovecraft adaptations?

Ultimately, the adjective proves more commercially viable than the author himself. “Lovecraftian,” whether it signifies existential dread or merely superficial references, is an easy sell; Shub-Niggurath appears as a villain in both the latest Alone in the Dark game and the South Park game humorously named after anatomical parts. The lore has become part of pop culture’s ambient noise, a convenient nod for fans. On a practical level, however, Lovecraft’s finest stories are challenging to film, particularly without a substantial budget; The Deep Ones struggled with basic lighting, let alone a compelling chase sequence. And who would invest millions in conventional retellings of nearly century-old novellas after Gordon demonstrated success by embracing sleaze?

Thus, it appears we will continue to see “Lovecraftian” applied to countless creations, whether they provoke cosmic contemplation or simply feature green monsters. And directors with limited talent or funds will persist in plundering Lovecraft’s literary legacy for direct-to-streaming fodder. While not ideal, this trend is understandable. Lovecraft himself, despite his philosophical musings, penned Re-Animator primarily as a means to earn a quick profit.

The Deep Ones is available for free streaming on Plex.