PR in the Philippines

` tags: ```xml Donald Trump has indicated his intention to invalidate presidential pardons issued by Joe Biden to individuals involved in the investigations concerning Trump, claiming the pardons were signed using an autopen. On Truth Social, Trump stated that the pardons granted by "Sleepy Joe Biden" to the "Unselect Committee of Political Thugs" are void due to the use of an autopen. He asserted that Biden did not personally sign the documents and was unaware of their contents, suggesting the necessary pardoning documents were not explained to or approved by Biden. However, legal experts contend that the U.S. Constitution does not grant the President the authority to overturn pardons, especially based on the signature method. Bernadette Meyler, a constitutional law expert and Stanford Law School professor, explains that the Constitution doesn't mandate a written pardon, making the autopen signature irrelevant to its constitutionality. Article II simply grants the President the power to pardon. An autopen is an electronic signature that replicates a handwritten signature, enabling individuals to sign documents remotely. Experts note that numerous statutes and documents have been signed using autopens. For example, Barack Obama used an autopen to sign a national security measure while in France. Meyler argues that invalidating presidential pardons due to autopen signatures could cast doubt on other policies signed using similar methods. She emphasizes that requiring literal signatures in an increasingly automated world would be a step backward. A 2005 opinion from the DOJ stated that a President is not required to physically sign a bill to enact it. The President can direct a subordinate to affix the President's signature to a bill, such as through an autopen, to fulfill the requirements of Article I, Section 7. Jeffrey Crouch, a professor at American University, asserts that pardons are final as long as they are valid. In addition to criticizing the autopen usage, Trump also questioned Biden's cognitive abilities when the pardons were issued. He suggested that Biden was unaware of the pardons and that those responsible may have committed a crime. Trump further stated that members of the "Unselect Committee," who allegedly destroyed evidence during their investigation of him, could be subject to investigation. Karoline Leavitt, White House Press Secretary, echoed this sentiment during a briefing, questioning Biden's awareness of the pardons and, when questioned for supporting evidence, directing reporters to investigate. These concerns were previously raised by Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey, who urged the DOJ to investigate Biden's actions on March 5, suggesting that Biden's cognitive decline allowed staff to implement radical policies without his informed consent. Experts suggest that any attempt by Trump to prosecute someone who received a presidential pardon would likely be challenged in court, where Trump's actions would likely be unsuccessful. Meyler believes that a court would likely uphold the pardon's validity despite the autopen issue. She notes that Biden made statements regarding the pardons, making it difficult to argue that they were not a decision of the President. ```

Popular injectable weight-loss medications are effective in helping individuals lose weight and improve health markers. However, as usage increases, doctors are uncovering more potential drawbacks of these GLP-1 targeting drugs. A recent, non-peer-reviewed Canadian study suggests that GLP-1 drugs may increase the risk of hair loss, particularly in women. Dr. Mohit Sodhi and his team at the University of British Columbia analyzed data from over 1,900 semaglutide users and 1,300 bupropion-naltrexone (Contrave) users. Semaglutide is found in Ozempic (for diabetes) and Wegovy (for obesity). Sodhi's research focused on Wegovy users to eliminate any potential impact that diabetes might have on hair loss. The study compared hair loss diagnoses in patient records. Results showed that semaglutide users had a 50% higher risk of hair loss compared to Contrave users. This risk was twice as high for women. The exact cause of the link between semaglutide and hair loss is unclear. However, Dr. Sodhi suggests that the physiological stress from rapid and significant weight loss caused by semaglutide may contribute. Semaglutide leads to faster and more substantial weight loss than older medications like Contrave. Another theory involves reduced nutrient intake. Semaglutide suppresses appetite, leading to lower consumption of essential nutrients like protein, vital for hair growth. Gastrointestinal side effects like nausea and vomiting can further decrease appetite and nutrient absorption. Whether the risk of hair loss outweighs the benefits depends on the individual's reasons for taking the medication (diabetes or obesity) and the severity of their condition. Diabetics might be more willing to accept the risk compared to someone using semaglutide for cosmetic weight loss, according to Sodhi. Studies on the long-term effects of GLP-1 drugs are crucial in helping people weigh the risks and benefits. Sodhi emphasizes the importance of understanding potential side effects before starting these medications. ```

Max Ebel escaped Nazi Germany after being attacked for refusing to join the Hitler Youth. Susumu Shimizu, a Japanese immigrant in Peru, was instrumental in managing a thriving family business in Lima. Neither Max nor Susumu had violated any laws or posed any threat to the United States. Despite this, the U.S. government detained these men for several years in World War II internment camps. Their imprisonment was deemed acceptable under the , a law permitting the wartime detention and deportation of non-citizens of Japanese, German, and Italian descent without any proof of disloyalty. Over a million U.S. immigrants were affected by the law and subjected to numerous restrictions. As "enemy aliens," immigrants like Max could face internment for the duration of the war. Moreover, like Susumu, thousands of Japanese, German, and Italian immigrants and citizens of Latin American countries were forcibly removed from their homes, sent to the United States, and then interned as "enemy aliens." They suffered indefinite detention in the camps, and many were deported to war zones when used in prisoner exchanges. We personally knew Max and Susumu and witnessed their suffering. They were our fathers. What they and other prisoners experienced in U.S. internment camps was a shameful period in our nation's history. Yet, we now observe the U.S. government on the verge of repeating this injustice. President Donald Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act on March 15—disregarding its role in justifying the wrongful internment of Max, Susumu, and thousands of others during World War II. A federal judge blocked the order, although . Echoing the law's disgraceful past, Trump stated he would use the law to target Venezuelan immigrants his administration labels as gang members, without any verified evidence or independent evaluation. Furthermore, his advisor Stephen Miller has suggested constructing to hold these immigrants while awaiting deportation. Trump’s "border czar" appointee Tom Homan advocated detaining immigrants' U.S. citizen-children and deporting them with their parents, a measure that would mirror the application of the Alien Enemies Act . Legal experts have criticized this proposed use of the Alien Enemies Act as unlawful. The law authorizes presidents to employ its summary detention and deportation powers only during declared wars or armed attacks by enemy nations. The Alien Enemies Act is a wartime measure, not a tool for presidents to address migration or even transnational criminal activity. However, reviving the Alien Enemies Act would be more than a legal transgression. It would be a betrayal of American ideals to target individuals for detention and deportation without any evidence of wrongdoing and based primarily on their place of birth. Our fathers are deceased, as are the vast majority of those interned under the Alien Enemies Act during World War II. They cannot speak out against this injustice, but we can and must. We must not repeat this law's devastating history of violating constitutional and human rights. Congress and past presidents have emphasized this in their official apologies to those interned under the Alien Enemies Act and . As President Bill Clinton stated when apologizing for the treatment of Japanese Americans, "We must learn from the past and dedicate ourselves as a nation to renewing the spirit of equality and our love of freedom." Now is the moment to uphold these values—the promise that the United States can learn from its errors to create a more perfect union. The promise of due process and equal justice under the law. The promise that all people are created equal and possess certain unalienable rights. President Trump must cease implementing the Alien Enemies Act. Instead, he should seek out with former Alien Enemies Act internees and their families to comprehend the and this law has already inflicted. Congress, for its part, should strive to repeal the Alien Enemies Act once and for all. We commend Senator Mazie Hirono and Representative Ilhan Omar for introducing a repeal bill in Congress. Dozens of groups representing former internees and their families, including our organizations, the German-American Internee Coalition and the Japanese Peruvian Oral History Project, have endorsed that legislation. We acknowledge that addressing our immigration challenges requires effort. However, the only appropriate way for our leaders to approach the Alien Enemies Act today is by recognizing the fundamental injustice of wartime internment and expulsions and by working to repeal the law, not reviving it to devastate the lives of other immigrants who call this country home.

 Conan O'Brien will be back at the  helm in 2026. The Academy's leadership announced on Monday that the comedian and former late-night TV host will be in charge of the 98th Academy Awards, scheduled for March 15. O’Brien quipped in a statement that his sole motivation for hosting the Oscars next year is to finally hear the conclusion of Adrien Brody's speech. This year marked O’Brien’s debut as the show's host, and it drew the largest audience  in the past five years, despite the Best Picture winner, “Anora,” being a relatively small film. ABC reported that the 97th Academy Awards ceremony earlier this month had an estimated 19.7 million viewers, with significant growth among the 18-49 demographic, largely attributed to younger viewers watching on mobile devices and laptops. It also claimed the title of the most-watched prime-time entertainment program of 2025. Craig Erwich, president of Disney Television Group, stated that Conan’s distinctive comedic approach perfectly suited the moment, and he is excited to have him back next year to deliver another unforgettable performance. O’Brien will be supported by a familiar team next year, with  returning as executive producers, alongside Jeff Ross and Mike Sweeney as producers.  and Academy President Janet Yang jointly stated that they are honored to collaborate once again with the team behind this year’s broadcast. Kramer and Yang noted that this year's team produced a visually spectacular and highly entertaining show that celebrated the nominees and the global film community in a beautiful and impactful way, and that Conan was the ideal host who guided the evening with humor, warmth, and reverence. According to Oscars organizers, the show's social media performance was also strong, surpassing both  and . Notably, this year's ceremony marked the first time the show was simultaneously streamed live on Hulu, which was . The announcement of next year's host and production teams comes unusually early, less than a month after this year's Oscars, for both the film academy and ABC.

` tags. The Trump Administration has recently launched a comprehensive attack on transgender individuals, removing mentions of transgender people from , threatening access to , and prohibiting transgender individuals from , among other actions. President Donald Trump and his allies have attempted to justify their anti-trans agenda by invoking “religious freedom” for Christians, asserting that God created only two genders, male and female, and that any alternative interpretation violates Christian tenets. However, this conservative “Christian” stance against trans rights is fundamentally unchristian. Having studied and taught the Bible for many years, we find no justification for the dehumanization of individuals created in God’s image. The Bible offers broad guidance, and we cannot allow right-wing groups to distort our sacred texts through misinterpretations. Other Christian faith leaders should also condemn these actions. The Bible never explicitly condemns transgender people or denies their existence. While conservative Christians may cite , which states that God made “male and female,” the Bible also uses both male and female imagery to describe God. For instance, in , God promises salvation and foretells the coming of the Messiah, comparing himself to a woman in labor: “For a long time I have kept silent… but now, like a woman in childbirth, I cry out.” Similarly, in , God speaks through Isaiah, offering comfort like a mother: “As a mother comforts her child, so will I comfort you.” In , God warns of the consequences of turning away, comparing himself to an eagle protecting its young and condemning those who forget “the God who gave you birth.” We believe God created transgender and intersex individuals, and gender fluidity is as integral to some of God's creations as identifying with a single gender expression. The struggle for the freedom to be is a timeless, biblical theme. Right-wing forces conveniently ignore the reality of gender fluidity expressed in scripture and throughout human history, overlooking key biblical themes of freedom and acceptance. Beyond specific verses, our sacred text consistently calls us to love our neighbors, support the vulnerable, and embrace all human beings without exception. Denying the existence of transgender people, bullying them, or undermining their rights violates these core moral values. As trans writer Julian K. Jarboe , “God blessed me by making me transsexual… so that humanity might share in the act of creation.” In addition to weaponizing the Bible, right-wing forces are imposing their narrow version of Christianity onto all aspects of , disregarding diverse religious perspectives. For example, President Trump directed the Department of Education to end support for , which could negatively impact their physical and mental health. There’s between and within religious traditions regarding gender identity. Imposing a singular view undermines our religiously diverse country and basic religious freedoms. Virtually every religious tradition respects the sanctity of human beings in their rich diversity, a teaching that should be applied throughout society. As religious leaders, we stand in solidarity with the transgender community and mourn the loss of trans lives, including Sam Nordquist, a trans man from Minnesota. We must stop using the Bible as a tool of hate and instead embrace its message of love and faith, working for justice and equality for all of God’s creations.

PARIS — Canada's new Prime Minister arrived in Paris on Monday to meet with French President Emmanuel Macron, seeking backing from one of Canada’s long-standing allies as U.S. President Donald Trump continues his assaults on Canadian sovereignty and. This marks Carney’s inaugural official overseas trip since assuming office on March 14. His next stop is London, where he is scheduled to meet with U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer and King Charles III, Canada’s head of state. Why Paris and London? Carney strategically chose the two European capitals that played a significant role in Canada’s early history. During his inauguration, he emphasized that the country was founded on the principles of three cultures: French, English, and Indigenous, stressing Canada's fundamental difference from the United States and stating it would “never, ever, in any way shape or form, be part of the United States.” Since came to power, he has implemented substantial and consistently, triggering widespread anger among Canadians and leading to calls for a boycott of U.S. goods nationwide. He is also threatening to impose tariffs on all Canadian products starting April 2. On Monday, a senior Canadian government official briefed reporters anonymously aboard the plane en route to pick up Carney in Montreal. The official explained that the trip aims to reinforce partnerships with London and Paris, adding that Canada is a “good friend of the United States but we all know what is going on.” Before his meeting with Macron at the Palais de l’Élysée, Carney will visit the Notre-Dame Cathedral. Macron is not expected to hold a joint press conference with Carney, which suggests the French president may be hesitant to publicly support Canada and risk upsetting Trump. Before heading back to Ottawa on Tuesday, Carney will journey to the edge of Canada’s Arctic to “reaffirm Canada’s Arctic security and sovereignty.” “Prime Minister Carney’s choice of itinerary for his first official trip highlights Canada’s strong ties to the Arctic, as well as its enduring connections to the two former colonial powers through the Commonwealth on the U.K. side and La Francophonie on the France side,” explained Daniel Béland, a political science professor at McGill University in Montreal. “The fact that Canada never violently separated from the U.K. is a crucial historical and institutional distinction between the United States and Canada, a constitutional monarchy with a U.K.-style parliamentary system rather than a republic.” The London visit will be a return of sorts for Carney, who made history as the first non-British governor of the Bank of England in its 319-year history, a position he held from July 1, 2013, to March 15, 2020. No Washington trip planned Carney, a former central banker who celebrated his 60th birthday on Sunday, has stated if he demonstrates respect for Canadian sovereignty. He currently has no plans to visit Washington but hopes to speak with the president by phone soon. His government is also reassessing the fighter jets in light of Trump’s trade disputes. Meanwhile, Macron is intensifying his efforts to encourage France’s allies to reduce their reliance on American military equipment purchases. This aligns with Canada’s reconsideration of the F-35s, and also addresses growing concerns in Europe about an over-reliance on U.S. weaponry, technical support, and goodwill for European defense. Carney spoke with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a call on Sunday evening and extended an invitation to the G7 summit this summer, which Canada is hosting. Trump has announced plans to speak with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday as part of his efforts to end the war in Ukraine. Carney is anticipated to announce an election by the end of the week, with the vote scheduled for late April or early May. Canada’s ruling Liberal Party appeared headed for a historic defeat this year until Trump initiated his economic conflict. Now, the party and its new leader may emerge victorious. ___ Associated Press writers John Leicester in Paris and Danica Kirka in London contributed this report.

` tags. `` Former U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy advocated for updated warning labels on alcoholic beverages in January, citing the need to inform the public about the link between alcohol and cancer, a connection many are unaware of. This action is potentially life-saving. However, experiences with tobacco regulation suggest that caution is warranted. The initial labeling of cigarette packages was considered a public health victory, but the law's vague warning ("Caution: Cigarette Smoking May be Hazardous to Your Health") did little to curb smoking and instead hindered more effective regulations, strengthening the tobacco industry's position. The Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act of 1965 primarily benefited Big Tobacco. In the early 1960s, nearly half of Americans smoked, despite growing evidence of tobacco's link to cancer. The 1964 Surgeon General's report definitively linked smoking to lung cancer, convincing a large percentage of Americans about the health risks. This report also spurred regulatory actions, including FTC scrutiny of tobacco advertising and state-level restrictions on cigarette promotion, according to Harvard University history of science professor Allan Brandt. While figures like Sens. Maurine Neuberger and Warren Magnuson championed the cause in Congress, the tobacco industry successfully pushed the 1965 law through, recognizing the inevitability of government intervention but preferring the more amenable legislative route. Michael Pertschuk, a Senate staffer, described the bill as "a sorry piece of tobacco knavery" in his book, noting that the tobacco industry got exactly what it wanted. By 1966, cigarette sales reached a record high, and the FTC found "virtually no evidence" that the warning labels had any significant impact. The law prevented state and local governments from implementing stricter labels and gave the tobacco industry significant legal protection. The industry later argued that the labels provided sufficient warning to the public about the risks of smoking. The New York Times called the law "a shocking piece of special-interest legislation," designed to protect the tobacco industry from proper regulation. An Atlantic Monthly article described it as "The Quiet Victory of the Cigarette Lobby." This pattern of the industry co-opting public health measures continued with other tobacco policies. For example, in 1969, Congress banned cigarette advertising on TV and radio. The Fairness Doctrine required broadcasters to provide free airtime to anti-smoking advocates, who effectively encouraged people to quit. Tobacco companies, unable to collectively halt advertising due to antitrust concerns or individually without losing market share, saw banning broadcast advertising as the best option. The tobacco industry "acceded" to this law, allowing Congress a moral victory, but smoking rates increased after the ban, according to economist Kenneth Warner. Smoking rates decreased by 7.2% in the three years before the ban, but increased over the three years that followed. Over time, cigarette package warning labels were strengthened, both in wording and variety. In 1984, Congress introduced four new labels, acknowledging the ineffectiveness of the old ones. While this seemed to signal a decline in Big Tobacco's influence, the fundamental issue of efficacy remained. Experts deemed the labels "woefully deficient" and "virtually invisible." From Big Tobacco's perspective, conceding to this bill might have helped the industry stave off more pernicious tax hikes. Some argue that taxes are more effective at helping people quit smoking than labeling. Tobacco taxes actually declined in real terms in the 1980s and 1990s, despite repeated pushes for increases. The key takeaway from tobacco policy is that reform requires vigilance to avoid inadvertently benefiting the industry. It's about standing firm against special interests co-opting public health language for self-serving "compromises." When implemented correctly, warning labels are valuable as public acknowledgment of a product's harms and as a catalyst for further action, even if they don't dramatically change behavior. In a society bombarded with conflicting information but sensitive to cancer risk, simply calling for updated labels provides a useful spotlight. Changing behaviors requires more than just warnings. Higher taxes, legal action, and comprehensive anti-smoking campaigns were key to reducing smoking rates in America. If the U.S. is serious about reducing alcohol-related harm, Murthy's cancer warning labels are merely an initial step. These warnings, combined with regulations like higher alcohol taxes, are more likely to save lives. Simar Bajaj studies epidemiology at the University of Oxford and is an award-winning journalist who has previously written for Washington Post, The Guardian, National Geographic, NPR, and The Atlantic. Made by History takes readers beyond the headlines with articles written and edited by professional historians. . Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors.

KOCANI, North Macedonia — In the wake of a devastating nightclub fire that claimed numerous young lives, North Macedonia is struggling to ensure accountability and prevent future disasters. The Club Pulse fire in Kocani, a town in eastern North Macedonia, erupted early Sunday, resulting in the deaths of 59 people and injuries to 155 others. The injured suffered burns, smoke inhalation, and trampling injuries as they desperately tried to escape through the building's sole exit. The cause of the fire is still under investigation, but video footage indicates that pyrotechnics used during a band's performance ignited the ceiling of Club Pulse, starting the blaze. The victims included individuals as young as 16, prompting the nation to declare a seven-day mourning period. “We are all in shock, and I am shocked myself: as a mother, as a person, as a president,” stated North Macedonian President Gordana Davkova Siljanovska in her Sunday night address to the nation. She added, “I still cannot believe that the terrible tragedy in Kocani is a reality. I do not know with what words to express my condolences to the parents and loved ones of the deceased. No one responsible should escape the law, justice and punishment! Let us not allow anyone to endanger the lives of innocent people anymore.” The fire, deeply felt in the nation of 2 million due to strong family connections, is the latest in a series of deadly nightclub fires worldwide. Allegation of bribery surrounding nightclub Authorities are investigating allegations of bribery related to the overcrowded nightclub, which was operating at twice its capacity. The government has ordered a comprehensive three-day inspection of all nightclubs and cabarets nationwide, beginning Monday. The country mourns as harrowing scenes unfold in the town of 25,000, where rescue workers spent hours recovering the charred remains of the victims. The fire caused a partial collapse of the single-story building's roof, revealing the burned remnants of wooden beams and other debris. Anxious parents gathered at hospitals in Kocani and Skopje, the capital city located approximately 115 kilometers (72 miles) west, seeking updates on their injured children. Dragi Stojanov, waiting outside the hospital in Kocani, received the devastating news that his 21-year-old son, Tomce, had died. “He was my only child. I don’t need my life anymore. … 150 families have been devastated," he told reporters. "Children burnt beyond recognition. There are corpses, just corpses inside (the club). … And the bosses (of organized crime), just putting money into their pockets.” Neighboring countries provide help Flags are flying at half-staff across the country. Health Minister Arben Taravari indicated that the death toll could increase, with 20 of the injured in critical condition. Neighboring countries such as Greece, Bulgaria, Serbia, and Turkey have already accepted many of the most severely injured patients. The government is also in discussions with other countries to arrange additional hospital transfers, according to officials. “All patients who have been transferred abroad are currently in stable condition. We hope it stays that way and that we will receive positive news from abroad,” Taravari stated on Monday, also mentioning that several countries are sending medical teams to North Macedonia. Safety code violations in the club “We even tried to get out through the bathroom, only to find bars (on the windows),” 19-year-old Marija Taseva told The Associated Press. “I somehow managed to get out. I fell down the stairs and they ran over me, trampled me. … I barely stayed alive and could hardly breathe.” She sustained a facial injury. According to a state prosecutor, a preliminary inspection of the nightclub revealed numerous safety violations, including a lack of emergency exits, an insufficient number of fire extinguishers, and inadequate access for emergency vehicles. Interior Minister Panche Toshkovski reported that 15 individuals have been detained for questioning after an initial inspection showed the club was operating without the required license and had at least twice its official capacity of 250 people inside. "We have grounds for suspicion that there is bribery and corruption in this case," he told reporters, without providing further details. Condolences have been sent from leaders throughout Europe, as well as from the office of Pope Francis. “I have had many difficult moments and challenges in my life but today is by far the most difficult day of my life,” said Prime Minister Hristijan Mickoski in a televised address. “My heart is breaking, and I have no strength to speak today. I am broken and my spirit is broken.” Late Sunday, residents of Kocani held a candlelight vigil to support the grieving families, waiting in long lines to light candles in church. Beti Delovska, an economist from Skopje, expressed that North Macedonia has never experienced a tragedy of this magnitude, with dozens of young people dying within minutes. She also pointed out that many young people with promising futures have already left the country in search of better opportunities. “(North) Macedonia is on its death bed,” Delovska said. “We have no more credible institutions, the health system is completely dismantled, education is poor, judiciary is partisan and corrupted to the bone. … I do believe now that only God can save (North) Macedonia.” —Testorides reported from Skopje, North Macedonia

WASHINGTON — President Trump has announced plans to speak with Russian President Putin on Tuesday in an effort to resolve the conflict in Ukraine. The President informed reporters of the scheduled discussion while traveling from Florida to Washington aboard Air Force One on Sunday evening. “We may have an announcement by Tuesday. I am scheduled to speak with President Putin on Tuesday,” Trump stated. “Significant progress has been made over the weekend, and our goal is to bring an end to the war.” This conversation could mark a crucial turning point in the conflict and provide Trump with an opportunity to further reshape U.S. foreign policy. European allies are concerned about Trump's apparent favor towards Putin and his tough stance on Ukrainian President Zelensky, who recently faced criticism during his visit to the Oval Office just over two weeks ago. Despite Russia's initial failure to conquer Ukraine three years ago, they still maintain control over a large portion of the country. Trump indicated that land and power infrastructure will be part of the discussions aimed at ending the war. “We will be discussing land and power plants,” he confirmed. Trump described the discussion as potentially involving “dividing up certain assets.” Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, recently visited Moscow to facilitate negotiations, suggesting earlier on Sunday that a call between Trump and Putin was imminent. During his conversation with reporters on Air Force One, Trump reiterated his intention to proceed with tariff plans on April 2, despite recent market volatility and economic concerns. “April 2 will be a liberating day for our country,” he said. “We are reclaiming some of the wealth that past presidents carelessly gave away due to their lack of understanding.” While Trump has occasionally adjusted tariff plans, such as with Mexico, he affirmed his commitment to reciprocal tariffs. “They impose charges on us, and we will impose charges on them,” he explained. “Furthermore, we will implement additional tariffs on automobiles, steel, and aluminum.”