PR in the Philippines

A Los Angeles judge has adjourned the Menendez brothers' resentencing hearing until next year, delaying a decision on their potential release after over three decades in prison for the murder of their parents. The 1989 shotgun killings of Jose and Kitty Menendez in their Beverly Hills home garnered significant public attention. Prosecutors claimed the brothers committed the crime for financial gain, while the defense argued self-defense stemming from years of alleged abuse. Following a mistrial, the brothers were found guilty of murder and received life sentences without parole. Los Angeles County prosecutors recently requested a resentencing, citing the brothers' good behavior, rehabilitation efforts, family support, and new evidence pertaining to the alleged abuse. Key aspects of the case are: Monday's Hearing Judge Michael Jesic of the LA County Superior Court addressed the brothers' plea for release. Their lawyers initiated a habeas corpus petition in May 2023, presenting new evidence regarding alleged paternal abuse. Following renewed public interest sparked by recent media coverage, District Attorney George Gascón proposed a new sentence of 50 years to life, potentially making them eligible for parole. However, Judge Jesic adjourned the December 11th hearing to January 30th due to the extensive evidence requiring review. Support for Release Erik and Lyle Menendez enjoy the support of most of their extended family, who publicly advocated for their release last month. Their aunts, Joan Andersen VanderMolen and Teresita Baralt, testified in court, expressing their desire for their nephews' release and maintaining contact with them during their imprisonment. Andersen VanderMolen described the alleged abuse as “unconscionable.” Baralt, close to Jose and Kitty Menendez, testified emotionally about the loss of both her family members and her nephews. Judicial Considerations The judge will likely consider new evidence supporting the brothers' claims of sexual abuse, much of which was excluded from the original trial. This includes a 1988 letter from Erik Menendez to his uncle detailing the abuse and recently surfaced evidence from Roy Rossello, a former Menudo member, who alleges abuse by Jose Menendez. The brothers' prison records, including their educational achievements and community involvement, will also be considered. Other Influential Parties Prosecutors will present their arguments against the brothers' release. The brothers' attorneys have sought clemency from Governor Gavin Newsom, but he deferred his decision pending review by the incoming District Attorney, Nathan Hochman. Hochman stated that the delayed hearing allows him sufficient time to review the case thoroughly, including records, transcripts, exhibits, and consultations with relevant parties.

In Islamabad, supporters of imprisoned former Prime Minister Imran Khan breached the shipping container barriers securing the capital on Tuesday, resulting in at least six fatalities amid the ensuing violence. Protesters clashed with security forces, disregarding the government's warning of lethal force. The deceased included four security personnel and a civilian, killed when a vehicle struck them. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif condemned the incident, labeling the perpetrators an "anarchist group" deliberately targeting law enforcement. No group claimed responsibility for the vehicular assault. Another police officer died in a separate incident. Shortly after midnight, Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi issued a threat, stating security forces would respond with live fire if protesters opened fire on them. “If they again fire bullets, the bullet will be responded with the bullet,” he stated. Police deployed tear gas to disperse the crowds. Numerous injuries were reported, including among journalists who were attacked by Khan's supporters. A videographer for the Associated Press was assaulted, his camera stolen, and he sustained head injuries requiring hospitalization. Pakistani media largely ceased coverage of the rally itself, instead focusing on security measures and the deserted city streets. Khan, incarcerated for over a year and facing more than 150 criminal charges, retains significant popular support. His party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), maintains the charges are politically motivated. Authorities assert that only courts can order Khan's release; he was ousted in 2022 via a no-confidence vote and imprisoned following his first graft conviction in August 2023, with subsequent sentences in other cases. Khan's supporters were approximately 10 km (6.2 miles) from their intended destination, the Red Zone, containing key government buildings. Naqvi reported that Khan's party rejected a government offer to hold the rally outside the city. Khan's wife, Bushra Bibi, leading the protest, urged peaceful progression towards the Red Zone, promising further action if Khan remained imprisoned. She also pleaded with the government to avoid harming demonstrators. To counter the protest, police arrested over 4,000 Khan supporters since Friday, and suspended mobile and internet services in some areas. On Thursday, a court banned rallies in the capital, with Naqvi warning of arrests for violations. Travel between Islamabad and other cities was severely hampered by roadblocks of shipping containers. All educational institutions remained closed. Mobile internet and messaging services in the capital experienced significant disruption. The PTI heavily utilizes social media to advocate for Khan's release and employs messaging platforms like WhatsApp to disseminate information, including event details. The X platform, banned in Pakistan, remained inaccessible even with VPN use. This violence coincided with an official visit by Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko. —Associated Press writer Munir Ahmed contributed to this report. ```

Facing pressure from conservative activists, Walmart, the world's largest retailer, is scaling back its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, following a trend among major corporations. Walmart's changes, confirmed Monday, are extensive. These include ending a five-year commitment to a racial equity center established in 2020, withdrawing from a prominent LGBTQ+ rights index, and ceasing preferential treatment for suppliers based on race or gender. Walmart's actions highlight the challenges facing corporate America after the Supreme Court's June 2023 affirmative action ruling. Empowered by this decision, conservative groups are challenging corporate DEI programs and hiring practices, leading to lawsuits. Conservative commentator Robby Starbuck has publicly criticized corporate DEI policies on X, prompting several companies, including Ford, Harley-Davidson, Lowe's, and Tractor Supply, to revise their initiatives. Walmart, with 1.6 million U.S. employees, is the largest company to make such significant changes. Starbuck hailed the changes as a major victory for his movement, noting his communication with Walmart. Walmart confirmed to the Associated Press that it will enhance monitoring of third-party marketplace items to prevent the sale of sexual and transgender products to minors, including chest binders. The company will also review grants to Pride events, ensuring they don't financially support content deemed inappropriate for children, specifying a concern about family areas being adjacent to drag shows. Furthermore, Walmart will no longer prioritize race and gender in supplier contract decisions, stating it never used quotas and won't in the future. Demographic data will not be considered for grant eligibility. Walmart also announced it will not renew funding for its racial equity center, a five-year, $100 million initiative focused on addressing disparities affecting Black and African American communities. Finally, the company will discontinue its participation in the Human Rights Campaign's corporate equality index. Walmart stated that its goal is to foster a sense of belonging for associates, customers, and suppliers. These changes follow former President Donald Trump's election win. Trump, a critic of DEI initiatives, has surrounded himself with conservatives who share his views, including Stephen Miller, whose organization, America First Legal, has challenged corporate DEI policies. A Walmart spokesperson noted some changes were already underway, such as phasing out "DEI" in job titles and communications, using "belonging" instead, and modifying its supplier program following the Supreme Court ruling. Conversely, some groups have urged companies to maintain their DEI policies. Last month, a group of Democratic members of Congress appealed to Fortune 1000 companies, emphasizing that DEI efforts promote equal opportunity.

NEW YORK — President-elect Trump plans to implement significant new tariffs on goods from Mexico, Canada, and China upon assuming office, aiming to curb illegal immigration and drug trafficking. These tariffs, if enacted, could impact a wide range of products, from fuel to vehicles. The U.S., the world's leading importer, relies heavily on these three nations as its primary suppliers, according to recent data. Trump issued these threats via posts on Truth Social, citing concerns about illegal immigration, despite border crossings being at a four-year low. “On January 20th, as one of my many first Executive Orders, I will sign all necessary documents to charge Mexico and Canada a 25% Tariff on ALL products coming into the United States, and its ridiculous Open Borders,” he stated, asserting that “thousands of people are pouring through Mexico and Canada, bringing Crime and Drugs at levels never seen before,” despite a decrease in violent crime since the pandemic. He indicated these tariffs would remain until the flow of drugs, particularly fentanyl, and illegal immigrants ceases. He also criticized China, stating that despite prior discussions regarding fentanyl shipments to the U.S., no progress has been made. “Until such time as they stop, we will be charging China an additional 10% Tariff, above any additional Tariffs, on all of their many products coming into the United States of America,” he wrote. It remains uncertain whether Trump will follow through with these threats, or if this is a negotiating tactic. Arrests of individuals illegally crossing the border from Mexico have declined and were near a four-year low in October, according to recent U.S. figures. Border Patrol recorded 56,530 arrests in October, less than a third of the previous October's total. A substantial amount of America’s fentanyl is smuggled from Mexico. Border seizures of the drug increased sharply under President Biden; approximately 21,900 pounds (12,247 kilograms) were seized in fiscal year 2024, compared to 2,545 pounds (1,154 kilograms) in 2019 during Trump's presidency. Trump's treasury secretary nominee, Scott Bessent, if confirmed, would be among those responsible for implementing tariffs. He has previously advocated for tariffs as a negotiating tool with other countries. He wrote in an article last week, before his nomination, that tariffs are “a useful tool for achieving the President’s foreign policy objectives. Whether it is getting allies to spend more on their own defense, opening foreign markets to U.S. exports, securing cooperation on ending illegal immigration and interdicting fentanyl trafficking, or deterring military aggression, tariffs can play a central role.” The threatened tariffs would present significant economic challenges for Canada and Mexico, in particular. They would also cast doubt on the stability of the 2020 trade deal, largely negotiated by Trump, which is subject to review in 2026. Spokespeople for Canada’s ambassador to Washington and its deputy prime minister, Chrystia Freeland, who heads a special Cabinet committee on Canada-U.S. relations addressing concerns about another Trump presidency, did not immediately respond. Trump’s promised mass deportation efforts are a key focus for the Cabinet committee, according to Freeland. A senior Canadian official, speaking anonymously due to authorization restrictions, stated that Canadian officials anticipate Trump issuing executive orders on trade and border issues immediately upon assuming office. Mexico’s Foreign Relations and Economy Departments also had no immediate response to Trump’s statements. These significant matters are typically addressed by the President during her morning press briefings. —Associated Press writers Adriana Gomez Licon in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Robert Gillies in Toronto, Mark Stevenson in Mexico City, Fatima Hussein and Josh Boak in Washington contributed to this report. ```

At the TIME100 Talks in London, three leading figures examined the critical challenge of translating scientific breakthroughs into practical, global solutions—from environmental sustainability to space exploration. In a discussion led by TIME's Phil Caldwell, Ceres Power's CEO, space scientist and communicator Margaret Aderin-Pocock, and Michael Short, former chief scientific advisor for the U.K. Department for International Trade, shared their experiences bridging scientific innovation and real-world application. Addressing climate change The panelists emphasized the urgent need for technological solutions to combat the climate crisis. Caldwell highlighted the need for accelerated progress, noting that while technologies like solar and electric vehicles are gaining traction, the most challenging 20% of decarbonization—in sectors such as steel, fertilizer, and aviation—requires further innovation. Ceres Power aims to expedite decarbonization in these sectors using green hydrogen and fuel cells, technologies that transform renewable energy into usable green molecules. Caldwell stressed the importance of investment in scaling and adopting these existing technologies. Aderin-Pocock emphasized the role of science and innovation, especially satellite technology, in responding to climate challenges, suggesting potential for improved disaster prediction and response systems. Science: a bridge or a chasm of inequity? Aderin-Pocock acknowledged that while science and technology offer significant benefits, their distribution is uneven. She highlighted that those most affected by climate change often lack adequate technological support. She underscored the need for inclusive development and highlighted the efforts to ensure equitable access to technological advancements, citing her work as an ambassador for the International Rescue Committee. Short cited mobile connectivity as a tool to address global inequality, enabling financial transactions and remittances in areas with limited banking infrastructure. However, he also noted that significant portions of the global population lack internet access, and that even those connected face challenges like language barriers and a lack of relevant content. Short emphasized the need for inclusive and adaptable technologies, stating that successful implementation requires more than just scientific advancement; it necessitates ensuring widespread accessibility and usability. Confronting science skepticism The panel discussed the significant challenge of overcoming resistance to change and distrust in science, which can hinder the adoption of innovative solutions. Aderin-Pocock stressed the need for open dialogue and widespread science engagement, especially within underprivileged communities, highlighting her organization's efforts to inspire public participation in science. Caldwell suggested that promoting a positive vision of the future is crucial in overcoming resistance to innovation. He emphasized the importance of collaborative efforts involving political will and business initiatives, suggesting that focusing on the benefits of technologies like clean energy, rather than the perceived drawbacks of change, will be more effective. The Power of Innovation: How Science Can Drive Global Solutions was presented by PMI.

The UN climate conference, COP29, concluded without universal satisfaction. Developed nations' commitment to substantially increase annual climate funding for developing countries fell short of expectations. The lack of stronger commitments to reduce fossil fuel emissions also drew criticism, and delegates remained deeply divided on new carbon market regulations. The late conclusion time, after extensive negotiations, added to the overall sense of frustration. “We are extremely disappointed,” stated Chandni Raina, an Indian negotiator, following the finance agreement. “Developing nations are being pressured to transition to carbon-neutral pathways, even at the expense of our economic growth.” However, despite widespread dissatisfaction, the talks resulted in an agreement, a notable achievement given the current geopolitical climate and rising isolationism. The election of Donald Trump as U.S. president shortly before the conference created significant uncertainty, raising the risk of complete failure. “We are navigating a period of extremely challenging global politics, and we should not assume that this will soon improve,” noted Wopke Hoekstra, the EU’s climate action commissioner. “Reaching an agreement is truly exceptional.” Negotiators ultimately decided that a flawed agreement was preferable to no agreement at all. Climate finance has long been a contentious issue, with developing nations arguing that wealthier nations bear responsibility for historical emissions. The U.S., for instance, accounts for a disproportionately large share of global emissions despite having a relatively small population. The finance deal commits developed countries to raising $300 billion annually in climate finance for developing nations by 2035 from public sources. This is significantly higher than the $100 billion commitment of 2009 but falls short of the trillion-dollar figure sought by many developing nations. Developing countries will monitor compliance closely. For developed countries, the financial commitment offers strategic advantages. Global climate action benefits all nations, and investments in emission reductions in developing countries help mitigate the effects of climate change. These investments also help to prevent cross-border crises related to climate change. (It is also important to note that much of the funding will be in the form of loans and investments rather than grants.) The crucial question is whether wealthy nations will fulfill their pledges. The outlook is challenging. Political pressures in Europe have led to cuts in international development funding. The situation in the U.S. is even more uncertain, with Congressional gridlock historically hindering climate finance initiatives. Further reductions under a Trump presidency are anticipated. The private sector’s role is also critical. The COP29 finance agreement aims for $1.3 trillion in annual finance by 2035 from all sources. This requires substantial private sector involvement and contributions from countries like China. Innovative mechanisms are needed to encourage private investment. Such mechanisms have been widely discussed, with the hope that public and philanthropic funding could reduce risks for private investors. However, skepticism remains, given the lack of strong incentives for private investors to focus on developing countries. Despite the obstacles, the COP29 agreement establishes new goals. The year 2035 will serve as a benchmark for assessing global progress, with both successes and failures likely to be highlighted. ```

WASHINGTON — On Monday, Special Counsel Jack Smith requested a federal judge dismiss the case against President-elect Donald Trump, citing long-standing Justice Department policy protecting presidents from prosecution while in office. This court filing concludes the Justice Department’s attempt to hold Trump accountable for what prosecutors described as a criminal conspiracy to retain power before his supporters attacked the U.S. Capitol on  Citing longstanding department guidelines preventing the prosecution of sitting presidents, Justice Department prosecutors stated that the Constitution mandates dismissal of the case prior to the defendant's inauguration. Prosecutors wrote in Monday's filing that this prohibition is absolute, irrespective of the charged offenses' severity, evidence strength, or the prosecution's merits, which the Government fully supports. This decision was anticipated after Smith’s team began evaluating how to conclude both the 2020 election interference case and the separate classified documents case following Trump’s election victory over Vice President Kamala Harris. The Justice Department believes established policy preventing the prosecution of sitting presidents precludes trying Trump. Trump has denounced both cases as politically motivated and vowed to dismiss Smith upon assuming office in January. Filed last year, the 2020 election case was initially considered a significant legal threat to the Republican's presidential bid. However, it encountered delays due to Trump’s extensive claims of immunity from prosecution for actions taken while in office. In July, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled for the first time that former presidents enjoy broad immunity from prosecution and remanded the case to U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan to determine which indictment allegations, if any, should proceed to trial. The trial court case had recently gained momentum. In October, Smith’s team submitted a comprehensive brief presenting new evidence for trial, alleging Trump resorted to crimes in a desperate attempt to overturn the election results following his loss to President Joe Biden.

The holidays are upon us, a time when many Americans accustomed to simpler meals prepare elaborate feasts. This isn't easy. Food poisoning outbreaks increase in November and December, according to the CDC. Undercooked stuffing and contaminated gravy from holiday gatherings have caused illness and even death, CDC investigations reveal. Preparing large meals safely can be challenging for infrequent cooks, notes Donald Schaffner, a Rutgers University food science expert. “Cooking and cooling take longer with large quantities of food,” explains Schaffner, co-host of the “Risky or Not?” food safety podcast. Schaffner and fellow co-host Benjamin Chapman, a North Carolina State University food scientist, offer tips for safe and festive holiday meals. Preparing the Turkey Nearly 90% of U.S. households plan to serve turkey this Thanksgiving, per Butterball. Raw turkey contains bacteria like salmonella and campylobacter, requiring careful handling to prevent contamination of surfaces. Frozen turkeys need thawing. Methods include refrigeration, microwave, or cold water, but each presents risks, cautions Schaffner. Refrigerator thawing takes roughly 24 hours per 4-5 pounds, according to the USDA. Microwave or cold water methods require immediate cooking. Consult the USDA for detailed safe handling guidelines. Do not wash the turkey. Rinsing spreads bacteria, explains Chapman. “Spray from rinsing contaminates the kitchen,” he states. Instead, pat the turkey dry with disposable paper towels or a sanitized kitchen towel. Roasting Turkey must reach 165°F internally. A digital thermometer inserted into the thickest part of the thigh (avoiding the bone) is best. Don't rely on pop-up thermometers; research shows they can activate prematurely. Don't judge doneness by browning, pinkness of meat, or clear juices. “These are unreliable temperature indicators,” Chapman points out. Side Dishes and Leftovers Proper handling of side dishes is crucial. Avoid the "danger zone" (40-140°F) where bacteria thrive. Keep hot foods hot and cold foods cold; refrigerate promptly, says Schaffner. “Refrigerate leftovers within two hours,” he advises. Refrigerate dense foods like sliced turkey and gravy in shallow containers for faster cooling. Schaffner's research indicates 2-inch depths minimize bacterial growth. Kitchen Hygiene Thorough cleaning prevents food poisoning. Wash hands before and after handling raw poultry. Use separate utensils for raw meat and fresh produce. Clean contaminated surfaces with soap and water, then sanitize with disinfectant. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Science and Educational Media Group. The AP is solely responsible for all content. ```